| Title | Difficult text with hard-to-read summary |
|---|---|
| Description | A text that requires a reading ability above the upper secondary education level, with a summary at the bottom that requires a reading ability higher than lower secondary education level. |
| Creator | BenToWeb (Christophe.Strobbe@…) |
| Rights | Copyright BenToWeb 2005-2007 |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2005-09-02 |
| Status | rejected QA |
Technologies are markup languages or data formats. If the technology is a markup language, “features” refers to elements and attributes.
XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition)
This test case is intended to fail because the summary that is provided is still too difficult. Only the reading level is tested here, not the other aspects of the document (descriptive section titles, expanded forms for abbreviations, etcetera).
Check whether the reading level needed to understand the summary is below lower secondary education level.
Three or more accessibility experts.
“Rules” refer to success criteria in WCAG 2.0, checkpoints in WCAG 1.0 and similar requirements.
The test case fails the following success criterion at line 80, column 3: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/guidelines.html#meaning-supplements.
The summary at the end of the document is too hard to read for people with a reading level that is not higher than lower secondary education level.
This test case maps to technique G86: Providing a text summary that requires reading ability less advanced than the upper secondary education level (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/Overview.html#G86).
The test case fails the following success criterion at line 80, column 3: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20050630/#meaning-supplements.
The summary at the end of the document is too hard to read for people with a reading level that is not higher than lower secondary education level.