A document with an object element in an image map. The object element embeds an image in PNG format, and contains another object element that embeds the GIF version of the same image. This second object element contains the image map and a text alternative that identifies the image and conveys the same information. Alternative text for two nested objects with both description and image map inside innermost object Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be en Copyright BenToWeb 2005-2007 2005-08-26 accepted QA How to specify alternate text General Inclusion: The object element How to create client-side image maps Client-side image maps: the map and area elements

This test case is intended to pass because the innermost object element contain appropriate alternative text. However, browser support for the object element may determine if this test case is accessible or not. Internet Explorer (version 6 or earlier) has weak or no support for the object element. Only the image itself is tested, not the image map.

 oneExpert

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 blindness low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 blindness low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 blindness low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 blindness low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 blindness low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 blindness low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 low vision

Did you understand what was in the image?

Begreep u wat er te zien was in de afbeelding ?

If you were not sure what was in the image, please indicate why this was unclear.

Indien u niet zeker was over wat er in de afbeelding getoond werd, geef aan waarom dit onduidelijk was.

 10 50 low vision

The image has a text description in the sentence preceding it and a longer one associated with the image. User testing with screen reader users provided the following results: most users of speech output could understand the image, but some users (3 out of 5) of a Braille display could not. (All were users of Internet Explorer 6 or 7.) User testing with magnification users provided the following results: one user of Internet Explorer 6 could understand the image. (Only one user of magnification for this test.)

The object element has an img element with an alt attribute as a fallback . Since there is no direct text alternative, it is not entirely clear if this code is accessible.

This test case is identical to sc1.1.1_l1_015, except that there is now a text description inside the innermost object element.

(In Mozilla 1.7.3 and Firefox 1.0, the map does not work if the map element has only an id and no name attribute.)

(Internet Explorer does not support object so the test does not work in this browser.)

The image has a text description in the sentence preceding it and a longer one associated with the image.

The object element has an img element with an alt attribute as a fallback . Since there is no direct text alternative, it is not entirely clear if this code is accessible.

This test case is identical to xhtml1_wcag2_20050630_1.1_l1_sc1_015, except that there is now a text description inside the innermost object element.

(In Mozilla 1.7.3 and Firefox 1.0, the map does not work if the map element has only an id and no name attribute.)

(Internet Explorer 6.0 does not support object so the test does not work in this browser - tested on both Windows 2000 and Windows XP Professional.)